<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notification of Potential Data Breach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roman.stanek.org/2007/09/13/notification-of-potential-data-breach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roman.stanek.org/2007/09/13/notification-of-potential-data-breach/</link>
	<description>BI, SaaS, travel and everything else...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:45:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://roman.stanek.org/2007/09/13/notification-of-potential-data-breach/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris Tuttle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanstanek.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/notification-of-potential-data-breach/#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve received this same form latter about 6 times in the last 2 years from nearly all my investment funds and one of my former employers, ironically IBM.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Clearly there are so many people involved with data that no effective controls exist today.  Having a centralized access control mechanism that uses a services based interface seems like a more secure approach.  I also think this is much more in alignment with the way Cisco thinks about data versus the system companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve received this same form latter about 6 times in the last 2 years from nearly all my investment funds and one of my former employers, ironically IBM.</p>
<p>Clearly there are so many people involved with data that no effective controls exist today.  Having a centralized access control mechanism that uses a services based interface seems like a more secure approach.  I also think this is much more in alignment with the way Cisco thinks about data versus the system companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

